Artist Perpetually in Progress
Search This Site

Visit Me Elsewhere

Mixed Media Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Powered by Squarespace
« Pen and Watercolor Fall ATCs | Main | Gold Study Completed »
Saturday
01Sep

Julie Molina's "Dream in Color"

Every so often I see something that makes me doubt everything I thought I knew about copyright.  Somerset Studio publishing this gorgeous piece in their Sep/Oct 2007 issue qualifies.

I love the artwork.  It deserves the full page spread it received. The images blending into each other in the rainbow of colors are picked well and the total composition is endlessly fascinating.  As Julie comments in her Q&A section, she even took special care at the border areas to use pictures that transitioned from one color to the next.  It's amazing.

But it has a Batman symbol, TINKERBELL! (cue the run from the Disney lawyers music), Velma from Scooby Doo, a photograph of a woman clad in flowers that has to be modern and someone has to have copyrighted somewhere, and so forth and so one.  I imagine all of these are magazine images of some sort. 

And as long as it was hanging in her dining room, it didn't matter.  But Somerset published it and reproduced it in many many copies.  Did they get permissions?  Do they have a different understanding of copyright law than I do?  Are magazines different than prints?  Do they feel its okay because no one element is necessary for the collage to be understood?  There's so much that would go into an actual suit if one happened.  Aaaargh. 

I would love to use unaltered and recognizable magazine cut-outs in some of my work and I don't because I'm afraid.  I'm afraid that I won't be one of those collage artists that somehow gets away with it.  That my pants will be sued off me.  I fully understand and respect the rights of the owners of those copyrights to do the suing.  But when I see art like this posted on the web with comments about gallery representation, or published in a magazine, or some such, well, I just feel jealous.  Because I would never dare to do that. 

The best online source I know of for copyright information and collage is still Copyright for Collage Artists by Sarah Ovenall at http://www.funnystrange.com/copyright/index.html .  It doesn't look like she's updated it in some years, but I can't imagine the law has changed that much.  Another extremely interesting resource is actually geared toward film students and presented in comic book form - http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/digital.php .

Anybody else know more about how this might be working?


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

I sure don't understand how Somerset could publish this piece of work. I haven't seen it, but it sounds wonderful :-)
and if there's recognizable images, how is that not violating copyright? I have many many greeting cards that I would love to use images from, or the whole image, but haven't because I thought that was a copyright violation.
so like you, I'm confused!
I also don't understand why you don't have dozens of comments-at least some with some insight into this-as this is rather a hot topic on the web. I'll try to put a link to this from the Weeks Ringle post (about not copying someone else's work) at WhipUp.
September 5, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEdie

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.